Yesterday SB 1070 was essentially neutered by U.S. District Court Judge Susan Bolton. Governor Jan Brewer is now sifting through the ashes of her misguided attempt to legalize racial profiling in Arizona. As of this writing the following facets remain from SB 1070:
Courtesy of Yahoo! News:
1) Arizona public officials are now prevented from limiting or impeding enforcement of federal immigration laws and are required by law to assist federal officials on immigration.
2) Arizona residents can sue state officials for failing to enforce immigration laws.
3) Amendments to the state’s human-smuggling law make it easier for police officers to make traffic stops on suspected smugglers.
4) It is now a crime to pick up day laborers in Arizona if doing so impedes the flow of traffic.
5) The law creates a fund to cover gang and immigration intelligence-gathering costs and to pay for immigration-related jail costs.
6) It toughens laws against employing illegal aliens.
7) It makes it a crime to, while committing another crime, induce someone to enter the U.S. illegally, harbor an illegal immigrant, or aid the entry of such immigrants into the United States.
The state can now impound vehicles used to transport illegal immigrants.
What was once Gov. Brewer’s pet project to provide local law enforcement the ability to perpetuate stereotypes and legalize racial profiling has now become nothing more than a tougher set of rules
to take on coyotes and those who hire illegal aliens. But Gov. Brewer is not going to sit idly by and accept defeat.On Thursday she filed an expedited appeal to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.
“America is not going to sit back and allow the ongoing federal failures to continue,” Brewer said in a statement. “We are a nation of laws and we believe they need to be enforced.”
As I noted in a prior blog Gov. Brewer is trying to usurp the Constitution and she doesn’t seem to realize that Federal Law overshadows her greatest efforts. Even the author of SB 1070, Senator Russell Pearce, seems to remain intrepid whilst his attempt to create fascist rule in Arizona goes up in flames.
“I got news for the anarchists,” Pearce said. “Our laws will be enforced.”
So according to Senator Pearce your author is an anarchist. I have always considered my self a liberal Democrat that felt a bit out of place in the very conservative desert of Arizona but according to a local politician I am a person who seeks to overturn by violence all constituted forms and institutions of society and government, with no purpose of establishing any other system of order in the place of that destroyed. dictionary.com
The protests against SB 1070 have been relatively violence free. SB 1070 was challenged and rendered toothless by concerned citizens that use the proper tools to seek change. They protested, they made their voices heard and they used the judicial system to render the change.
Referring to those against you as anarchist gives this author the impression that Senator Pearce is out of touch with his constituents and should probably listen to the people he is supposed to represent. I am not insulted by being referred to as an anarchist. I know that this is nothing more Conservative rhetoric. It’s no different than McCarthyism for the new millennium.